verloop2.jpg
verloop2.jpg (copy)
Procurement
stad stad-deel-2.png munt_1.png munt_2.png munt_3.png munt_4.png munt_5.png stad-deel-2.png (copy)
Road to implementation
stippelpijl_4x.png stippelpijl_4x.png (copy)
pijl_1_4x.png
  • Competitive procedure without negotiation
  • Competitive procedure with negotiation
  • Competitive dialogue
  • Idea sourcing / design contest
  • Innovation partnership
  • Launching an RFP immediately

Procurement types:

01
pijl_1_4x.png (copy)
  • City buys product/service (concession)
  • Licensing
  • Permits

Purchase:

02
pijl_1_4x.png (copy1)
  • Tech-only partnership

    Turnkey operation

  • Subsidized rides on private services

  • Co-marketing

  • Encourage private market presence

03

public-private partnership during implementation

Request for proposal/offer (RFP)

Implementation

The procurement matrix 
How to make an informed decision for the right procurement type

Conventional products & services (e.g. traffic lights, street lighting, bus stops, etc.) are generally procured by directly launching detailed RFPs. However, the concepts of Smart Shared Mobility (e.g. MaaS, Shared bikes/cars, self-driving vehicles) are relatively new to the market with a new set of involved stakeholders (e.g. recently founded SMEs with unproven business models or new technologies). Sourcing such innovative solutions require new or additional procurement methods in which cities are less familiar with. 

The process for selecting and implementing is non-standardised and currently carried out on an individual basis. The matrix is supporting cities to select the suitable procurement type based on the characteristics of their mobility project. 

 

footershape.svg btn_up.svg
arrow-rechts-2.png
Challenge driven
arrow-rechts-2.png (copy)
Solution driven

very suitable

plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy)

adequate

plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy1)

neutral

plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy2)

not suitable

plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy3)

not suitable at all

plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy4)
plus-plus_2x-8.png plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy2) plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy3) plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy4) plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy5) plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy5) plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy5) plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy5)
plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy3) plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy4)
plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy) plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy1) plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy2) plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy3)
plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy1) plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy4) plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy5) plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy6) plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy7)
plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy2) plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy3) plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy4) plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy4) plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy5) plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy6) plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy7) plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy6) plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy7) plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy8)
plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy3) plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy5) plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy6) plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy7) plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy8) plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy9)
plus-plus_2x-8.png (copy4)
index_icon_2_2x.png

Cities need to adopt the right procurement type to source and select mobility providers. Once the desired mobility provider has been identified, the final purchase is achieved through a Request for Proposal (RFP) which defines the terms of a formal collaboration (direct contracting, licensing, issuing permits).

Procurement types to select mobility solutions

scroll down

verloop2.jpg (copy)
Procurement types for selection of provider and/or solution development
07

Cities often have to make a choice for which solution providers they allow to deploy their products and services. In this handbook, we call the process of cities sourcing and selecting mobility providers 'procurement'. The final 'purchase' (via Requests for Proposals (RFPs)  is done through ‘direct contracting’, ‘licensing’, or issuing permits.

stad
stad-deel-2.png
munt_1.png
munt_1.png (copy)
munt_1.png (copy1)
munt_1.png (copy2)
munt_1.png (copy3)
stad-deel-2.png (copy)

Conventional products & services (e.g. traffic lights, street lighting, bus stops, etc.) are generally procured by directly launching detailed RFPs. However, the concepts of Smart Shared Mobility (e.g. MaaS, Shared bikes/cars, self-driving vehicles) are relatively new to the market with a new set of involved stakeholders (e.g. recently founded SMEs with unproven business models or new technologies). Sourcing such innovative solutions requires new or additional procurement methods in which cities are less experienced in using. The process for selecting and implementing is non-standardised, currently carried out on an individual basis and dependent on a new set of decision drivers. The matrix is intended for cities to understand to what extent different decision drivers affect the choice for selecting a suitable procurement type.

pijl_1_4x.png
  • Competitive procedure without negotiation
  • Competitive procedure with negotiation
  • Competitive dialogue
  • Idea sourcing / design contest
  • Innovation partnership
  • Launching an RFP immediately

Procurement types:

01
Road to implementation
pijl_1_4x.png (copy)
  • City buys product/service (concession)
  • Licensing
  • Permits

Purchase:

02
pijl_1_4x.png (copy1)
  • Tech-only partnership

    Turnkey operation

  • Subsidized rides on private services

  • Co-marketing

  • Encourage private market presence

public-private partnership during implementation

03
verloop2.jpg
The procurement matrix 
matrix

Implementation

Request for proposal/offer (RFP)

footershape.svg btn_up.svg
For a better view of the matrix, please switch to desktop